A Defense Of Abortion Thesis Explain The Structure Of The Five Paragraph Essay

Thomson’s argument is weakened however by the disparity between the imagery in her analogies and the reality of pregnancy and of abortion.In what follows, I will critically examine the weaknesses of Thomson’s rhetoric, focussing on her first analogy involving the parasitic violinist who has been attached to you through kidnapping and to whom you serve as life support.I will argue that Thomson’s attempt to analogize pregnancy and abortion through the inflation of the fetus to the level of an adult within the violinist example actually reveals how unsuitable the analogy is and ultimately weakens her work’s overall thesis.The role of the violinist in the analogy parallels the fetus in a pregnancy.

She distinctly argues that her sense of the term “right” is not restricted to legality, and although she does not specify what it does pertain to, she implies that her definition has to do more with morality (Thomson 16).

Even just by using the nefarious figure of a burglar in the first place, Thomson suggests that intention plays a role in morality.

This would also suggest that the fetus, who has not knowingly made any conscious decision to occupy his or her mother’s body, has more of a right to be there than the violinist who was not only implanted through an intentional kidnapping, but also possesses the adult consciousness to realize the imposition he or she is placing on your body.

The violinist example is therefore exempt of the imposed emotions inherent in a natural maternal relationship.

Thomson’s use of analogies in “A Defense of Abortion” shed a unique light on and provide an accessible entry point to various angles of the discussion of abortion, however examination of the violinist analogy reveals the failure in its suitability and her failure to address and compensate for the many gaps between the violinist figure and the fetus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “A Defense Of Abortion Thesis”