A Review Of Literature
A literature review should begin with a thorough literature search using the main keywords in relevant online databases such as Google Scholar, Pub Med, etc.
Once all the relevant literature has been gathered, it should be organized as follows: A literature review should not be a mere recounting of all the available information.
Use reporting verbs to indicate Through citations, situate your research in a larger narrative.
The conscientious use of citations reflects your decisions to give greater emphasis to either the reported author or the reported message.
Your ideas should be at the center of your writing, but your work has to be embedded in what has come before to demonstrate its relevance and importance to the subject.
The Literature Review connects your ideas to the ideas in your field.
Experimental literature review basically refers to surveying all the information available on a particular topic and critically analyzing the gaps that need to be worked upon.Include the following content in your Literature Review: Your transitions between ideas analyze, synthesize, and assess these outside perspectives, and do not simply summarize or translate them.Your attitude towards works that you present, either in support or against your topic, through the use of reporting verbs which allow the writer to convey clearly whether the claims in the outside work are to be taken as accepted or not.These guidelines are adapted primarily from Galvan (2006).Galvan outlines a very clear, step-by-step approach that is very useful to use as you write your review.Therefore, it is one of the most critical parts of one’s research.Every research report/ thesis/research article begins with an introduction to the topic of research. The main purpose of the review is to introduce the readers to the need for conducting the said research.In this sense, it essentially forms the first experiment of any research project.The more extensive the review, the more precise and systematic the research project will be.This section compares and contrasts published studies and identifies gaps that have not been addressed or have been unsuccessfully addressed. This section differs slightly between reviews which are part of research articles and narrative reviews.The section describes the main conclusions from analysis of all the current studies and puts forth further avenues for research.