Essay On Courtesy Spring From Kindness Of Heart
If one is to get a balanced view of Hume’s thought, it is necessary to study both groups of writings. B1475 1985b 192 86-27306 ISBN 0-86597-055-6 ISBN 0-86597-056-4 (pbk.) 05 04 03 02 01 C 8 7 6 5 4 04 03 02 01 97 P 1 0 9 8 7 4 but these are the works that were read avidly by his contemporaries. The 1758 edition, for the first time, grouped the essays under the heading “Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary” and divided them into Parts I and II. Two-volume editions appeared in 1764, 1767, 1768, 1772, and 1777.In preparing this new edition of Hume’s fidelity to the text of the 1777 edition has been a paramount aim.Hume’s peculiarities of spelling, punctuation, and capitalization have been retained, because these often bear on the meaning of the text.3 The reader should know, however, that there are some minor departures in the present edition from that of 1777: (1) typographical errors in the 1777 edition have been corrected silently; (2) Greek passages are reprinted as they appear in Green and Grose, with corrections and accents; (3) footnotes are designated by arabic numerals rather than by Hume’s symbols (in cases where these designations are adjacent to the punctuation mark, they have been relocated so that they follow, rather than precede, the mark); (4) whereas Hume’s longer footnotes are lettered and collected at the end of the volume in the 1777 edition, the present edition puts them at the bottom of the appropriate page, as was the practice in editions of the up to 1770 (with the change in location, it was no longer appropriate to capitalize the first word of these footnotes); (5) whereas two sizes of capitals as well as lowercase letters are used in essay titles in the 1777 edition, titles here are in level capitals; (6) the “long s” has been eliminated throughout; and (7) the running quotation marks in the left margin have been omitted, and the use of quotation marks has been made to conform to modern practice. The editor’s notes are enclosed in brackets to distinguish them from Hume’s own notes.
The volume has rarely been in print, and the last critical edition was published in 1874-75. Twenty essays were added along the way, eight were deleted, and two would await posthumous publication.
In 1748, three additional essays appeared in a small volume published in Edinburgh and London.7 That volume is noteworthy as the first of Hume’s works to bear his name and also as the beginning of his association with Andrew Millar as his chief London publisher.
If we should neglect the essays or the the same title early in 1742,6 and later that year, a “Second Edition, Corrected” of the first volume was issued.
Over the past seventy years, however, the essays have been overshadowed, just as the 16—Liberty Fund has made a neglected side of Hume’s thought accessible once again to the modern reader.
Many years after Hume’s death, his close friend John Home wrote a sketch of Hume’s character, in the course of which he observed: “His Essays are at once popular and philosophical, and contain a rare and happy union of profound Science and fine writing.”17 This observation indicates why Hume’s essays were held in such high esteem by his contemporaries and why they continue to deserve our attention today. Grose for the version of the Because of initial difficulties in obtaining a photocopy of the 1777 edition, Green and Grose’s text was used as editor’s copy for the current project.