Essay On Freedom Of Speech Tennessee Williams The Glass Menagerie Essays
Always, it was the goal of protecting community values that motivated oppression.Perhaps the toxic consequences of censorship—a history, where abridging the freedom of expression has been related to the political suppression of important ideological perspectives, especially those of political minorities—are not as salient to our generation, to which free speech is a rather abstract ideal.Not only does it antagonise potential allies in the fight for justice, but it also fails to acknowledge the reasons why controversial views exist in the first place, or to address any logical, moral or ethical problems inherent in them.For those who hold those views, strategies of censure and reproach are unlikely to eradicate those convictions and actually risk leading instead to confirmation bias, strengthening the original prejudice.I was going to the most liberal part of America, carrying with me a deep love of freedom, born from the painful history of a country where censorship used to be a powerful tool for oppression.In my first week on campus, a classmate questioned the premise of affirmative action in tech.The current phenomenon of college students demanding “no platform” policies and “safe spaces” is admirable in its goal of protecting marginalised groups.
Limiting freedom of expression goes against the very idea of democracy, threatening to impede social progress and the fight for just and egalitarian social order.
Freedom of expression is especially vital in universities.
Restricting speech is an assault to freedom of thought, which is fundamental to the main purpose of an educational institution, that of developing students’ ability to think critically and independently.
There are two distinct but related reasons for this.
The first has to do with freedom of speech as a fundamental right, vital to democracy, social change and the ability to fight injustice.