Hillary Clinton Foreign Affairs Essay Functionalist Theory Sociology Essay
Read: Elizabeth Warren test-drives her presidential campaign.
Most significantly, Warren acknowledges that “the United States is entering a new period of competition” with China and Russia, which she calls “would-be rivals” that “hope to shape spheres of influence in their own image” and “are working flat out to remake the global order to suit their own priorities.”She’s not Trump.
The content of Sweden’s feminist foreign policy is still in the making, and is currently focused on incremental change in two areas: (1) international agenda-setting through a gender-sensitive lens that allows for the reframing and mobilization of international policy action; and (2) normative entrepreneurship, which is guided by an ethically informed framework of cosmopolitanism and human rights that seeks to shape global developments in a gender-sensitive direction.
This essay strives to examine and highlight some of the substance and plausible future directions of feminist foreign policy. First, we aim to probe the normative contents of the Swedish feminist foreign policy in theory and in practice, and examine how feminist international relations (IR) theory may contribute to the widening and deepening of its normative and ethical contents.
Then, last month, in a speech at Johns Hopkins, he included both U. He mentioned China only three times: twice as a potential partner in fighting climate change and once as a potential partner in denuclearizing North Korea.
Second, it contains a normative reorientation of foreign policy that is guided by an ethically informed framework based on broad cosmopolitan norms of global justice and peace.For Warren, American foreign policy only started going wrong “in the 1980s,” when “Washington’s focus shifted from policies that benefit everyone to policies that benefit a handful of elites, both here at home and around the world.” The chronology is odd: American foreign policy benefited “everyone” in the 1970s, during Vietnam?It’s another sign that Warren is less interested than Sanders in challenging American exceptionalism, less interested in looking at the dark side of America’s history as a superpower.Second, we identify and analyze three potential challenges and ethical dilemmas that any feminist foreign policy is likely to confront: “headwind” politics; tension between idealism and pragmatism; and challenges posed by the use of soft and hard power.Third, we conclude the essay by advancing a research agenda that can deepen the normative and ethical notions of a feminist foreign policy.The 2020 presidential campaign is still in its infancy.But it’s already becoming clear that when it comes to foreign policy, Warren’s vision is more conventional; Bernie Sanders’s is more radical. In the tradition of Henry Wallace, George Mc Govern, and Jesse Jackson, Sanders has decoupled progressive ideals from American dominance.Warren wants to work with Beijing, in particular, against climate change.But she also wants America to maintain the international order that it has dominated, and prevent a rising China from establishing a sphere of influence. If Warren thinks such a contest is inevitable, she must explain how pursuing it will further—rather than undermine—progressive ideals. In 2014 the world’s first self-defined feminist government was formed in Sweden.As part of that ambitious declaration, Sweden also became the first state ever to publicly adopt a feminist foreign policy, with a stated ambition to become the “strongest voice for gender equality and full employment of human rights for all women and girls.” To be sure, launching a feminist foreign policy is a radical policy change.