Peer Review My Essay

This section is also where you will disclose any potentially competing interests, and mention whether you’re willing to look at a revised version of the manuscript.

Do not use this space to critique the manuscript, since comments entered here will not be passed along to the authors.

The point is not to nitpick every piece of the manuscript.

Your focus should be on providing constructive and critical feedback that the authors can use to improve their study.

This shows the editor how you interpreted the manuscript and will highlight any major differences in perspective between you and the other reviewers.

Give an overview of the manuscript’s strengths and weaknesses.

According to Elsevier, a major academic publisher, "Peer review helps validate research, establish a method by which it can be evaluated, and increase networking possibilities within research communities." Peer-reviewed articles are used in education, for future research, and in current practice, so it's important that they be accurate.

Here’s how your outline might look: In your own words, summarize what the manuscript claims to report.This will also help you keep your comments organized.Think about structuring your review like an inverted pyramid.It’s helpful to divide this section into two parts: one for major issues and one for minor issues.Within each section, you can talk about the biggest issues first or go systematically figure-by-figure or claim-by-claim.Prove yourself once and you’ll get asked to review again!Having fellow experts within your field evaluate your work before publication is not just a formality; it's an essential part of the academic world.Number each item so that your points are easy to follow (this will also make it easier for the authors to respond to each point).Refer to specific lines, pages, sections, or figure and table numbers so the authors (and editors) know exactly what you’re talking about.Even if you decide not to identify yourself in the review, you should write comments that you would be comfortable signing your name to.In your comments, use phrases like “the authors’ discussion of X” instead of “your discussion of X.” This will depersonalize the feedback and keep the focus on the manuscript instead of the authors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “Peer Review My Essay”

  1. Why do you think that Swift chose to use the devouring of children’s flesh as the basis of this proposal? For instance, Montaigne's essay "Of Cannibals" argued that, though they ate human flesh, the cannibals were more noble than we were in their other conduct; Jonson's Volpone, suggested that Europeans' greed turned them into animals who preyed upon one another (see the I.1 "duet" between Volpone and Mosca in which they praise Volpone for what he do, but others will, in pursuit of money); Behn's Oroonoko, argued that sophisticated Europeans were more debased than the "Natural Man" (compare especially the behavior of the Native Americans vs.