Television News Analysis Essay Essays On Eros By Robert Bridges
Finally, we examine the way in which audience beliefs and understandings relate to changes in commitments to alter individual behaviours in their intersection with structural support – and the impact of such changes for wider social change.
The advent of digital media has shown that the world is made up of a mass of circulating, disjointed, and often contradictory information.
Finally, we discuss the implications for communications and policy and how both the traditional and new media might help in the development of better informed public debate. Handling Editor: Andrew Livingstone, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom *Corresponding author at: Glasgow University Media Group, Adam Smith Building, Bute Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RT, United Kingdom. [email protected] This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2013, Vol. The media – television, the press and online – play a central role in communicating to the public what happens in the world.
In this way, ideology (meaning an interest-linked perspective) and the struggle for legitimacy by groups go hand in hand.An effective flow of information between the various distinct groups in the public sphere has historically been made possible by the mass media, which systematically edit and interpret the mass of information, making some sense of the world for audiences.As certain knowledges have been promoted over others, they have effectively been given the privileged status of being authoritative and, in some cases, truthful (Fairclough, 2003; Glasgow University Media Group, 1976, 1980, 1982; Herman & Chomsky, 1994; Van Dijk, 1998).But the relationship of media content to audiences is not singular or one-way.Policymakers, for example, can both feed information into the range of media, and also attempt to anticipate audience response to the manner in which policy is shaped and presented.We found other evidence of the way in which media coverage can operate to limit understanding of possibilities of social change.In our study of news reporting of climate change, we traced the way that the media have constructed uncertainty around the issue and how this has led to disengagement in relation to possible changes in personal behaviours.The media can effectively remove issues from public discussion.The analysis of media content – of what we are told and not told – is therefore a prime concern.The conditions under which people accept or reject a message when they are aware of a range of alternatives are fundamental to this process, and are discussed in depth.We then discuss the ways in which such attitudinal shifts facilitate changes at the level of policy.