Thesis Statements Freud
Some researchers have already attempted to consider Freudian hypotheses at the light of cognitive science and neuroscience (Figure 1).Among them, Shevrin and Dickman (1980), in a seminal paper, started out from the common consensus that defines unconscious processes are (1) psychological events that are unknown to the patient but that actively affect its behavior, and adduced empirical data in favor of the more challenging Freudian postulate that (2) unconscious processes are ruled by specific laws of organization.
Nevertheless, the emotionally charged human faces triggered the subject’s amygdalae.
In the 1980s, the terms “cognitive unconscious” were invented to denominate a perspective on unconscious mental processes independent from the psychoanalytical views.
For several reasons, the two approaches to unconscious are generally conceived as irreducible.
In conclusion we propose that current experimental and theoretical works reveal that the opposition between Freudian and cognitive unconscious rests on a methodological misunderstanding. Relationship between latency and duration for highest and lowest frequencies by word category.
(Left) Unconscious conflict words (U); (middle) conscious symptom words (C); (right) Osgood unpleasant words (E–). One of the first and most persistent criticisms of Freud is that the existence of unconscious representations is self-contradictory.