Uk Supreme Court Essays Managed Services Business Plan
The argument is that these liberal courts took it upon themselves to 'update' the Constitution, to make it a living document, relevant to our times. You should mention here how, arguably, the more activist and liberal a court is then the more political it is.
A non-activist, conservative court is arguably less likely to make political decisions since it does not believe in a living constitution and does not interpret as loosely as does a liberal court.
Hope that helps a little and is what you were looking for I have just done and AQA one about the political nature of the UK and US judiciaries You need to say about how in the US they have the power to act politically as due to their codified constitution under judicial review they have the ability to change the law whereas in the UK judicial review is limited as parliament remains Sovereign (but make sure you point out that the EU has eroded some of parliaments soverigntiy and how the EU convention of human rights giving the courts much more power in the UK as has devolution as they have to interpret develoved legislation) In the US the Supreme court can also choose to act with judicial restraint- avoiding any constitutional issues where possible or they can act with judicial activism where they can take a pro-active role to alter the constitution such as The Warren Court (look at the Topeka vs Brown case) you may also want to put about the seperation of powers and the aim in the US is to make the judiciary less political by having the powers completley sperate whereas in the uk with the fusion of powers they're not seperate- law lords in the house of lords and the appointemnt of Lord Chancellor.
but you can also say here that under the 2005 constitutional reform act this is chaging- creation of British supreme court and abolishing the Lord chancellor The appointment of judges can also be seen as political- chosen by PM or president to power for them to be chosen for their political reasons but UK- again under the 2005 CRA their is to be a judicial apointment commitee to be set up that includes a mix of normal people and politicans to select the judges.
my friend talked a lot about loose and strict constructionism in hers, and how that impacts on the way they interpret the constitution hi, I have a really similar essay (to what extent can it be said that the supreme court is as much concerned with policy making as it is with the constitution?
) or something : P I'm not sure how to go about mine either...
From approximately 2001 onwards, the courts started to allocate 'neutral citations' to cases.Hi, i have been set an essay, but im not sure of the main points i should include. "Are supreme court justices politicians in disguise? ) or something : P I'm not sure how to go about mine either... hi, I have a really similar essay (to what extent can it be said that the supreme court is as much concerned with policy making as it is with the constitution?gives advice on how to cite and reference law reports (cases).There is a distinction made between: - Citing and referencing cases from 2001 onwards, where a neutral citation is available for the case.Hope that helps a little and is what you were looking for It makes no sense does it that they wanted it to be unpolitical, but in the end it ended out that it is political.I emailed my teacher from last year (he moved away to canda) But he is good, and has had some of hte best results for government and politics across england!If no probs and you get all this then I can finish it off for you." This really is some stuff yto get your head arouns lol!Its helpful for the whole judiciary part of the A level though!Neutral citations enable people to find cases online more easily.Each neutral citation is made up of: As a general rule, if you are looking at a case on the British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII) webpage, the neutral citation (if there is one) will be listed at the top right hand side of the page.